Tuesday, June 17, 2014
What's the matter with the post office? The US Post Office, I mean-the corporate hierarchy that runs this enormously popular public institution. Yes, I know that USPS has lost revenue it traditionally got from first-class mail delivery, but I also know that letter carriers and postal workers have offered many excellent ideas for expanding the service that USPS can deliver, thus increase both revenue and the importance of maintaining treasures.
Yet, the Post Board of Governors, which includes corporate interests that would profit by killing the public service, seems intent on – guess what? – Killing it, the board's only “idea” is to cut service and shut down hundreds of local post offices. Incredibly, their list of closures include the historic post office in Philadelphia's old city, the very building Ben Franklin presided as our country's first postmaster general appointed by the Continental in 1775.
All across the country, post offices that are invaluable artistic and historic assets are slated to be sold to developers. One is the marvelous 1935 Bronx Post Office, with classic architectural flourishes and 13 museum-worthy murals. “It's not just a post office,” says one customer fighting the closure, “it's part of my life.” No one feels that way about a FedEx warehouse. Yet, says a USPS spokeswoman dismissively, the four-story building is severely underused.
So use it! Put a coffee shop in it, a public Internet facility, a library and museum, a one-stop government service center, and as USPS employees have suggested, a public bank offering basic service to the thousand of neighborhood people ignored by commercial banks. Come on USPS show a little creativity and gumption. And remember that “service” is a key part of your name!
John T. Nickoless
The News is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. We do not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News.